DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE

                                        UNIT OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT PLAN

 

GRADUATE PROGRAMS

 

Desired Learning Outcomes

 

A.  Ph.D. Program

 

            The Political Science Ph.D. program is designed to produce broadly educated and well-trained scholars and teachers. Our aim is to produce Ph.D.s who have the breadth and vision to grapple with large questions, to make original contributions to those questions, and the ability to communicate research results to students, their peers, and society at large. Thus, we strive to strike an appropriate balance between 1) exposure to theoretical models in political and social research, 2) sophisticated training in the methods and techniques of social science, 3) the development of expertise within a student's primary area of research and teaching, and 4) exposure to classroom teaching. More specifically, every GSU Ph.D. should be able to:

 

1. Demonstrate familiarity with the breadth and diversity of models, approaches, and intellectual traditions within that student's major sub-field of expertise.

2. Demonstrate competency in at least a second substantive area of political science.

3. Demonstrate a high level of competency in research skills appropriate to his or her research endeavors and a familiarity with a broad range of methodologies, including quantitative and qualitative approaches.

4. Demonstrate a full understanding of the research enterprise. This includes an ability to critique others' work and an ability to be a contributing scholar by producing original research.

5. Demonstrate an ability to teach courses in his or her primary field and sub-fields of the discipline.

 

B.  M.A. Program:

 

Graduates with a M.A. degree should be able to:

 

1. Demonstrate research skills commensurate with their area of specialization. 

2. Demonstrate knowledge of the research literature in their area of specialization.

3. Demonstrate ability to write a professional research report or thesis in their area of specialization indicating ability to formulate research questions, to synthesize such questions with appropriate literature, to utilize appropriate research methods to answer the question(s), and to analyze data so as to answer the question(s) and raise additional questions.

 

Assessment Methods

 

The Director of Graduate Studies (DGS) and the Graduate Program Committee shall review, on a yearly basis, a series of different indicators and benchmarks in order to assess the attainment learning outcomes. The DGS will make a yearly report with findings and recommendations to the Chair to the Chair of the Department by the end of the spring semester.  The first report will be due by end of spring semester 2005 using the measures of assessment listed below.

 

 A. Doctoral Program

 

1.      Based on the learning outcomes specified above for the doctoral program, the members of each doctoral dissertation committee will individually provide to the DGS a written assessment stating the degree to which the dissertation and its defense indicate success in achievement of these outcomes.  The assessments should be provided to the DGS within a week of the oral defense

2.      Based on the learning outcomes specified above for the doctoral program, the lead reader (as designated by the DGS) for each field or sub-field doctoral comprehensive committee shall write an assessment of the degree to which the answers provided by the students indicate success in achievement of the outcomes.  The assessments shall be provided to the DGS at the time the evaluation of the exam is given to the DGS.

3.      Utilizing syllabi and data from student evaluations of graduate students teaching courses, the DGS shall assess the competence of doctoral graduate students in teaching courses.

 

B.  M. A. Program

 

                Based on the learning outcomes specified above for the M.A. program, the members of the M.A. thesis committee or of non-thesis paper will individually assess the achievement of the student in terms of the learning outcomes listed above.  The members will provide their assessments to the DGS within one week of the defense of the thesis or paper.

 

 

 

UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM

 

Learning Outcomes and Measures of Assessment

 

The Political Science undergraduate program serves multiple audiences, most notably departmental majors and those students who take political science courses to fulfill university requirements or out of general interest. Student learning objectives include:

 

I.        Substantive Knowledge

 

A.     Students should demonstrate understanding of structures and processes of American and Georgia government commensurate with performance of citizenship duties and an effective civil society.  Specifically, students should have a fundamental knowledge of constitutionalism, federalism, separation of powers, civil liberties, and the electoral process.

 

Assessment:  Students should be able to pass exams involving these concepts.  The Department will review syllabi and exams from Pols 1101 classes to ensure that students are being successfully taught these concepts in this required class that emphasizes these concepts.

 

B.     Students should demonstrate recognition of the universality of politics in human experience and appreciation of political issues from a global perspective. 

 

 Assessment:  Students should be able to pass exams demonstrating the political nature of global issues.  The Department will review syllabi and exams from Pols 2401, a required class in which this outcome is addressed, to ensure that the outcome is being addressed successfully.

 

II.     Analytical Skills:

 

A.     Students should demonstrate an understanding of the difference between normative and descriptive explanations of political behavior.

B.     Students should demonstrate an ability to assess evidence using principles of logical analysis  and be able to apply that evidence when making conclusions.  This outcome  includes the ability to recognize appropriate supporting evidence as well as assessing contrary evidence.

 

Assessment:  See assessment under Section III.

 

III.   Communication Skills: 

 

A.     Students should demonstrate an ability to write a paper or make an oral presentation with a clear thesis statement or question, support this statement or address this question in a logical manner, and draw logical conclusions from findings.  In doing so, students should demonstrate organizational skills of presentation without distracting grammatical errors.  In such communication, students should demonstrate the analytical skills in section II above. 

B.     Students should be able to demonstrate an ability to support their findings by citing relevant authorities.  Students must not use the ideas of others without citation.

 

Assessment:  The Department requires writing assignments in all upper division courses and encourages communication assignments in the lower division.  In order to assess the achievement of students in regard to the goals of sections II and III, the Department will require students to present at the time of their senior audit their best paper written in a political science class.  Such papers will be used by the Department to assess its success in achieving these outcomes.

 

IV.  Methodological Skills:

 

A.     Students should demonstrate basic knowledge of the use of social statistics.

B.     Students should demonstrate an ability to understand data reported in various forms.

C.     Students should demonstrate an ability to conduct research using traditional and new technological resources.

D.     Students should demonstrate an understanding of the scientific method, including the formulation of hypotheses and the role of independent, control and dependent variables

 

Assessment :  The teaching of methodological skills is the primary goal of Pols 3800, a required course for all majors.  The Department will evaluate syllabi and tests used in this course to see that these skills are being addressed.                                                                

 

Implementation of Assessment and Recommendations

 

            The Director of Undergraduate Studies (DUGS) and the Undergraduate Program Committee will implement the assessment process outlined above on a yearly basis and provide a report of the findings, plus any recommendations, to the Chair of the Department by the end of spring semester and to the Faculty at the beginning of Fall Semester.